The modern era, broadly defined as the last 250 years or even from 1500, is characterized by widespread and accelerating change due to developments like the Industrial Revolution, French Revolution, and advancements in technology and science. However, while we like to think of our culture as “advanced” and “progressive,” we need to examine our situation critically:
- The emergence of capitalism and the coherent, bureaucratic State in Early Modern Europe (17th-18th Century) developed distinct, amoral rationales for their existence, operating outside of traditional moral structures. Capitalism, focused on economic "interests," broke away from destructive sectarian conflicts but led to profit being prioritized over morality. Similarly, the doctrine of "raison d'etat" allowed the State to act without regard for Christian compassion, focusing on its own self-perpetuation. This has left modern societies struggling to find a moral anchor, especially after the decline of traditional religious authority. The pursuit of wealth and privilege often drives domestic and international policymaking, with moral arguments holding a "tenuous place".
- The sheer pace and quantity of change in the modern world, particularly with technological advancements like the internet and AI, can be overwhelming, leading to psychological distress, disorientation, and nihilism. This "noise of the world" from endless news, social media, and consumer marketing crowds out peace of mind and makes it difficult to process information. The constant "disruption" is now standard, and the information/robot/AI revolution is still in its infancy.
- Modernity has seen social fabrics erode, exacerbated by political polarization and a lack of confidence in joint social/political action. There is a "deconstruction of our shared social picture of reality," leading to "epistemological silos" where different groups perceive reality differently. This contributes to ungovernability and a rejection of the state, as society struggles to cope with a world more complex than humanity is psychologically equipped to handle. Governments often fail to meet expectations, bogged down by complexity, over-institutionalization, and conflicting interests.
- The "cultural religion of 'progress,' development, and modernity" has significant environmental and global costs, visible in floods, wildfires, and the looming climate crisis. Modern capitalism's exploitation of the globe and its focus on short-term economic claims by older generations contribute to climate issues and child suffering. Stark economic and social inequality is visible both within societies and internationally, driven by the maintenance and expansion of privilege and wealth.
- Despite apparent rapid change, the modern era is also marked by sclerosis and resistance to change in its institutions. Decades of pressure are often needed for significant social shifts, and many formal structures and regulations remain outdated, creating "icebergs of tradition that chill the prospects of moving our society forward".
- While democracy is a hallmark of modernity, its promise has often been aspirational rather than fully realized, with historical progress being incremental and elites often retaining control. This risks mobocracy and the undermining of truth in modern democratic societies. Nationalism, while initially a force for broader identity in the 19th century, has become a source of instability, oppression, and horrific acts in the 20th and 21st centuries, often serving as a "reactionary ideology" against globalization.
- Western powers, particularly the US, claim a "moral high ground" and a mantle of democracy while engaging in actions inconsistent with these ideals, such as imperialism, exploitation, and selective moralizing. This self-righteousness often blinds them to their own historical culpability and current shortcomings.
Historical perspectives offer a crucial lens through which to understand and respond to these critiques:
- History helps us to understand that "progress" is not linear and that current problems are often rooted in deep historical processes. It encourages a critical examination of the "self-congratulatory culture" that constructed narratives of human progress and the benefits of science and rationality. Historians can "depower history" by challenging narratives that focus solely on the powerful and by including the stories of those historically excluded, thus offering a more complete picture of modernity's impact.
- Understanding the "mentalité" of people from other eras is crucial for comprehending past decisions and avoiding present-day projections onto the past. This applies even to the values of "liberty" or "happiness," whose meanings have changed over time.
- Historians recognize that assessing recent events is difficult because their long-term significance is not yet clear, and perspectives change over time. What might seem like a major crisis today (e.g., the "Covid Era") may fade into insignificance in future historical accounts.
- While history offers "a humongous pile of examples of human behavior", it does not provide simple "lessons" or predictive power for the future. Direct analogies to past events can be misleading because circumstances are always unique due to a "complex stew of choice, chance and human agency". The rapid pace of modern change and new legal/social structures (e.g., social media, climate degradation) may even render historical analogies irrelevant for present problems.
- Societies can be "overly focused on the past," hindering their ability to adapt and move forward. Sometimes, "consigning the past to the past" and making a conscious decision to "forget" certain historical grievances or details can be beneficial for stability and progress.
- Modernity, with its scientific advancements, promised knowability but also led to a "deconstruction of our shared social picture of reality". Historians understand that "truth" itself is a complex concept, and historical narratives are always "selective, skewed, and incomplete". This understanding is critical when evaluating the validity of various critiques of modernity, as perceptions are flavored by individual and cultural perspectives.
RSS Feed